Groupon to Offer Exclusive Deals through Local Newspapers


The quickly growing deal-a-day site Groupon has entered in to a partnership with The McClatchy Company -- owner of The Miami Herald, The Sacramento Bee and several other newspapers -- to outsource exclusive Groupon deals to McClatchy websites in 28 U.S. markets.The partnership means that McClatchy websites will now distribute Groupon-brokered deals that are specific to each locale and distinct from the offerings on Groupon.com. Sacramento and Kansas City will be the first two regions to experience the Groupon addition to their websites according to a statement from the company.This particular partnership represents both a new distribution model for Groupon's deeply discounted coupons, and an alternative revenue model for newspapers hoping to monetize their content online. Should the outsourced Groupon deals appeal to local news consumers, the new monetization strategy could help solve the some of the growing financial woes of newspaper companies while helping Groupon continue to grow and maintain its domination over other deal-a-day sites.

For more Social Media coverage:


News Faceoff: Twitter vs. Newspapers

This Web Faceoff series is supported by Buick.

It’s time once again for a new edition of our Web Faceoff Series, wherein we pit two services, devices or trends against each other for a knock-down, drag-out fight for the affection of MashableMashableMashable readers.

Last week we saw Google TV defeat Apple TV in the web television arena, and this week we turn our attention to a question whose answer appears to be shifting: Where do you get your news?

Considering the growing role of social networks in how we consume information, it’s a good time to pit the following two sources against each other: Where do you get more of your news from these days, Twitter or newspapers?

Cast your vote in the poll below until Sunday, June 6 at 3 p.m. PST to make your voice heard. And be sure leave a comment below about the reasoning behind your vote. Happy voting!




Faceoff Series: Overall Results


Week 1:
- Mozilla Firefox vs. Google Chrome
- WINNER: FirefoxFirefoxFirefox, 4600 votes (ChromeChromeChrome: 3310 votes, Tie: 911 votes)

Week 2:
- Tumblr vs. Posterous
- WINNER: TumblrTumblrTumblr, 1809 votes (PosterousPosterousPosterous: 1496 votes, Tie: 256 votes)

Week 3:
- Pandora vs. Last.fm
- WINNER: Last.fm, 1187 votes (PandoraPandoraPandora: 1156 votes, Tie: 122 votes)

Week 4:
- Twitter vs. Facebook
- WINNER: Facebook, 2484 votes (Twitter: 2061 votes, Tie: 588 votes)

Week 5:
- WordPress vs. Typepad
- WINNER: WordPressWordPressWordPress, 2714 votes (TypepadTypePadTypePad: 267 votes, Tie: 357 votes)

Week 6:
- Windows 7 vs. Snow Leopard
- WINNER: WindowsWindowsWindows 7, 3632 votes (Snow Leopard: 3278 votes, Tie: 121 votes)

Week 7:
- TweetDeck vs. Seesmic Desktop
- WINNER: TweetDeckTweetDeckTweetDeck, 3294 votes (Seesmic DesktopSeesmic DesktopSeesmic Desktop: 1055 votes, Tie: 260 votes)

Week 8:
- Microsoft Office vs. Google Docs
- WINNER: Microsoft Office, 1365 votes (Google DocsGoogle DocsGoogle Docs: 994 votes, Tie: 315 votes)

Week 9:
- Apple iPhone vs. Google Android
- WINNER: Google Android, 3323 votes (Apple iPhone: 1494 votes, Tie: 228 votes)

Week 10:
- AT&T vs. Verizon
- WINNER: Verizon, 1161 votes (AT&T: 538 votes, Tie: 118 votes)

Week 11:
- Google vs. Bing
- WINNER: GoogleGoogleGoogle, 2180 votes (BingBingBing: 519 votes, Tie: 97 votes)

Week 12:
- iPod Touch/iPhone vs. Nintendo DS vs. Sony PSP
- WINNER: iPod Touch/iPhone, 704 votes (Sony PSP: 639 votes, Nintendo DS: 482 votes, Tie: 108 votes)

Week 13:
- Digg vs. Reddit vs. StumbleUpon
- WINNER: DiggDiggDigg, 14,762 votes (Reddit: 11,466 votes, StumbleUponStumbleUponStumbleUpon: 2507 votes, Tie: 1032 votes)

Week 14:
- Old versus new Twitter retweets
- WINNER: Old style retweets, 1625 votes (New style retweets: 699 votes, Tie: 227 votes)

Week 15:
- Gmail vs. Outlook
- WINNER: GmailGmailGmail, 3684 votes (Outlook: 980 votes, Tie: 590 votes)

Week 16:
- Boxee vs. Hulu
- WINNER: HuluHuluHulu, 626 votes (BoxeeBoxeeBoxee: 591 votes, Tie: 106 votes)

Week 17:
- Nexus One vs. iPhone 3GS
- WINNER: Nexus One, 6743 votes (iPhone 3GS: 2818 votes, Tie: 592 votes)

Week 18:
- Foursquare vs. Yelp vs. Gowalla
- WINNER: FoursquareFoursquareFoursquare, 1182 votes, (YelpYelpYelp: 661 votes, GowallaGowallaGowalla: 509 votes, Tie: 143 votes)

Week 19:
- AIM vs. GTalk vs. FbChat
- WINNER: GTalkGtalkGtalk, 2189 votes, (AIMaimaim: 1257 votes, FbChat: 511 votes, Tie: 203 votes)

Week 20:
- Music Ownership vs. Music Subscription
- WINNER: Ownership, 533 votes (Subscription: 299 votes, Tie: 237)

Week 21:
- Match.com vs. PlentyofFish
- WINNER: Plenty of Fish, 430 votes (Match.com: 334 votes, Tie: 187 votes)

Week 21:
- Google Buzz vs. Facebook Vs. Twitter
- WINNER: Facebook, 3353 votes (Twitter: 1828 votes, Google BuzzGoogle BuzzGoogle Buzz: 1298 votes, Tie: 651 votes)

Week 22:
- HTML5 vs. Adobe Flash
- WINNER: HTML5, 3892 votes (Adobe Flash: 1779 votes, Tie: 660 votes)

Week 23:
- Project Natal vs. PlayStation Move
- WINNER: Project Natal, 1268 votes (PlayStation Move: 668 votes, None: I don’t like motion controllers: 170 votes, None: I prefer the Wii: 150 votes)

Week 24:
- Chatroulette vs. Hot or Not
- WINNER: Chatroulette, 742 votes (Hot or Not: 281 votes, Tie: 99 votes)

Week 25:
- iPad vs. Netbooks
- WINNER: iPad, 3098 votes (Netbook: 1969 votes, Tie: 605 votes)

Week 26:
- Amazon Kindle vs. Apple iBooks
- WINNER: Apple iBooks, 1227 votes (Amazon Kindle: 928 votes, Tie: 118 votes, Neither: 276 votes)

Week 27:
- Next-gen iPhone vs. Droid Incredible
- WINNER: iPhone 4G, 9765 votes (Droid Incredible: 8175 votes, Tie: 1318 votes)

Week 28:
- Facebook “Like” vs. “Become a Fan”
- WINNER: “Become a Fan”, 3161 votes (“Like:” 1634 votes, Indifferent: 719 votes)

Week 29:
- Physical keyboards vs. Virtual keyboards
- WINNER: Physical QWERTY keyboard, 2563 votes (Virtual keyboard: 2010 votes, Prefer T9 typing: 176 votes, Tie: 346 votes)

Week 30:
- Google TV vs. Apple TV
- WINNER: Google TV, 1674 votes (Apple TV: 617 votes, Neither: 341 votes, Both: 242 votes)


Series supported by Buick

This Web Faceoff series is supported by Buick.

[newspaper img credit: DRB62]



For more social media coverage, follow Mashable Social Media on TwitterTwitterTwitter or become a fan on FacebookFacebookFacebook




Publish2 Aims to Oust the Associated Press

Publish2, a news curation and linking startup, unveiled its news distribution platform, News Exchange, on Monday. The company hopes this initiative will replace the Associated Press’s “obsolete cooperative” and monopoly over content distribution to newspapers.

So how will the Publish2 News Exchange compete with the news cooperative giant? By creating a “New Associated Press for the 21st Century,” a network that includes both free and paid content that enables news organizations to easily distribute their content to subscribed news media that can then publish the content in print or online. The new platform is currently in beta and will be rolled out this weekend, but users new to Publish2 can still register.

Although the new platform is aimed at newspapers, several new media organizations (including MashableMashableMashable) have signed up for content distribution. In a blog post announcing the new product, Publish2 CEO Scott Karp said, “We’re enabling newspapers to benefit for the first time from the disruptive power of the web, and from the efficiency of production on the web.”


Content Distribution and Subscription


The News Exchange enables newspapers to replace AP content subscriptions with web content, and in exchange web producers are able to showcase their brands in print. As Karp points out, print publishing and distribution still drive newspaper operations, even its web production, which sometimes is nothing more than a dumping ground for stories from the day’s paper. The goal is to bridge the gap between print and web publishing, Karp wrote in his post. The platform makes it easier to distribute and subscribe to content through “newswires” set up by participating news organizations online through authenticated webfeeds, FTP, etc.

For example, Mashable newswires include all of our site channels for specific topics, as well as a general newswire for all of our content. In a demo, Publish2 Director of News Innovation Ryan Sholin said print publishers are able to easily subscribe to a newswire and feed that the content into their print publishing content management systems.

In setting up a newswire, news organizations can control who can use their content as well as how that content is used. Sholin also pointed out that some news organizations already have content sharing agreements in place. The News Exchange gives them a place to efficiently share that content with one another, he said.


Story Ideas and Budget Items


Although content distribution is at the core of the new product, several other features make content sharing and production more strategic and efficient. For example, the Story Ideas feature enables news organizations to create specific ideas that have yet to be reported and produced as a way to pitch the idea to other news companies. It’s also a way for news organizations to put out a call for coverage on stories they don’t have the resources to report on at the moment, said Sholin.

“Maybe one newspaper editor says they’d like an explainer on how offshore oil rigs work, then 18 more editors request that idea, too,” Sholin said. “Suddenly, other journalists in the system see it’s a popular request. There might be a nonprofit news org or even a freelancer with experience reporting on the topic who can answer the question and write the story.”

If there is a big story that is coming up, and a news company wants to promote it, they can individually add the story with a summary as an upcoming story budget item that its subscribers should keep an eye out for.


What’s Missing?


Analytics: Because the News Exchange is still in beta and has yet to be rolled out, there are some missing features. The big one publishers will be concerned about is being able to track how your story is used by your subscribers. There’s no easy way of doing this — especially if a web story is being published in print — aside from, perhaps, the publisher sending a courtesy PDF showing where the story appeared.

However, Sholin said a form of analytics will come. “We’re going to make sure news organizations know where their stories are published, when, how often, and if possible, what page in the paper they’re running on,” he said. The goal, he said, is to provide news orgs with data on how their content is used, and as News Exchange gets rolled out, Publish2 is going to play with different variation of analytics and reporting though it may require a manual effort from news orgs using the content.

Photos and Tagging: Other features will include the capability to share photos and more easily find specific content through automated semantic tagging.

Marketplace: Another feature that news organizations will likely be happy about that is in the works is Publish2  is planning for a marketplace that Sholin said will allow news orgs to set a price on subscriptions to their newswires or sell content a la carte.



For more social media coverage, follow Mashable Social Media on TwitterTwitterTwitter or become a fan on FacebookFacebookFacebook



The Future Newsroom: Lean, Open and Social Media-Savvy

Newspaper Laptop ImageOn the campus of Penn State University, a rivalry between a rogue campus blog and the official newspaper has become a fascinating mirror of the strife between old and new media. In only a matter of months, the unofficial campus blog Onward State, has marshaled the power of social media to compete with the award winning 112-year-old campus paper The Daily Collegian. With one-tenth of the Collegian’s staff size, Onward State has constructed a virtual newsroom that collaborates in real-time with Google Wave, outsourced its tip-line to Twitter, and is unabashed about linking to a competitor’s story.

Perhaps the most interesting thing about this sociological Petri dish is that many of the players began as teenagers. In other words, the old/new media rivalry might not be generational, but ideological. What follows is a practical look at the successful social media strategies of Onward State, and a comparison of the world views of two camps of student journalists and their professional counterparts — a comparison that portends a long war to come.


A Crowdsourced Newsroom

Onward State Image

“We focused on our Twitter presence from the very beginning, and it’s paid dividends for us in terms of referring traffic to the site and really becoming a part of the community,” said Davis Shaver, founder of Onward State. Tapping the power of the crowd has been essential to multiplying the resources of Onward State’s relatively tiny news team. By being responsive to the social media community, Shaver told MashableMashableMashable that they “curated this ecosystem in the sense that people will actually send stories to us on Twitter.”

The transparent back-and-forth embeds Onward State into the hub of campus conversation. For instance, when an academic department decided to try its hand at democracy and hold a naming contest for the new student center, Onward State was a natural partner, whom they first informed via Twitter. As such, Shaver never underestimates the “sheer power that a well-run Twitter feed can have.”

On the other side of the aisle, The Collegian takes a decidedly expert-based approach. Editor-in-Chief Rossilynne Skena said that while social media is “great for getting out short bursts of information,” the Collegian’s competitive advantage is “really going into depth and detail about a particular subject,” complete with perspectives from local leaders. Instead of putting their ear to the social media grindstone, The Collegian tracks down leads through trusted sources. Once a connection is made, Skena prides herself on being able to assign a person experienced in the field with personal “training” from the Collegian.

Shaver’s defection from The Collegian, due to what he believed was a technologically-phobic bureaucracy, is a mirror imagine of what was happening to some newsrooms in the mid-2000s. Erin Weinger, a former Los Angeles Times fashion writer, recounts her frustrations with her editorial team. “It took multiple meetings and various e-mails to get the permission needed to get my section on Twitter,” she said.

“Journalism has remained so unchanged … that journalists didn’t feel they had to change.” As such, there was a general skepticism of online sources. “Leads can be found everywhere now, from places you’d never deem credible in the past. Amateur blogs, for one … But, five years ago, if you said you were citing a stranger on the Internet you’d [probably] get yelled at by an editor.”

Appropriately enough, Erin now runs her own LA fashion blog.


To Link, or Not to Link

Collegian Image

It should be no surprise then that Onward State happily promotes a competitor’s story with direct links, while The Collegian questions the very logic of such a strategy. Shaver admitted that he doesn’t always produce the web’s best content, and has “no qualms about writing the blog post and porting to the story.” For Skena, linking to a competitor’s story “doesn’t make sense.” A symbolic move which tells readers to “go read our competition” would be devastating to the trust they’ve worked for over a century to gain, according to Skena.

The largely philosophical wrestling match over linking stories became a professional journalism crisis when a New York Times journalist was caught plagiarizing in order to push out a time-sensitive news story. Felix Salmon, a blogger for Reuters, argued that the root of this dishonesty lies squarely in the link-phobic mindset of old-media journalists.

“[W]hat’s more depressing still is that even the bloggers at the [New York Times] and [Wall Street Journal] are link-phobic, often preferring to re-report stories found elsewhere, giving no credit to the people who found and reported them first. It’s almost as though they think that linking to a story elsewhere is an admission of defeat, rather than a prime reason why people visit blogs in the first place.

Salmon concluded, “It’s a print reporter’s mindset.”


Virtual Collaboration

“Our office really consists of my dorm room, I guess. We don’t have any kind of physical structure, so we use [GoogleGoogleGoogle] Wave as our virtual newsroom,” said Shaver. Throughout the day, Shaver and his team monitor several waves at once, each tailored for a different department. In a single browser tab, Shaver has a unique eagle’s-eye view of the entire newsroom. In real-time, his editorial team can toggle between multiple conversations or throw an idea out to the crowd for greater perspective.

Consistent with its crowdsourcing mantra, Google WaveGoogle WaveGoogle Wave permits more inclusive perspective and helps keep eyes everywhere on campus. For perspective, Shaver uses Google Wave to canvas his writers, which hail from different social groups on campus. As such, he’ll put “the nucleus of an idea up in wave and [let] it float and see what people say about it.”

As for keeping tabs on campus activity, because there is no formal workplace, Onward State writers are already situated throughout the university. For instance, when the Oscar Meyer Weiner Mobile came to Penn State, Onward State reporters were already sprinkled throughout campus, and a writer in the vicinity could have been tapped to snag a quick photo. As silly as it may seem to give priority to something like the Weiner Mobile, hyper-local news is still about competitive advantage, and speedy reporting gives Onward State an upper-hand.

The low-overhead of a crowdsourced newsroom has become an appealing alternative as the Internet’s top destinations, from CraigslistCraigslistCraigslist to Google, erode the advertisement cash cow that once funded well-staffed newspapers.

Now, a talented writer with a broadband connection can reach the same audience. As new media advocate Jeff Jarvis wrote on his blog “I’m seeing that it’s possible for someone to come along with relatively little investment and a much smaller staff that operates more collaboratively to compete with the big, expensive traditional newsroom at low cost.”

In contrast, The Collegian thrives in the dynamic of a centralized newsroom. “What we really like is when we’re able to work with the people face-to-face,” said Skena. Instead of tossing up an idea to a digital billboard, Skena likes the ability to throw the keyboard to a colleague for help punching through writer’s block.


Hobbyists Aren’t in it For the Money

When Rupert Murdoch, chairman of Newscorp, began elaborating on its threats to pull Fox News content from Google News, the thrust of his point was simple: “Quality content is not free.”

Arriana Huffington, who’s blog was implicitly indicted in Murdoch’s article, responded with a visceral rebuttal. Huffington argued that people like Murdoch “can’t understand why someone would find it rewarding to weigh in on the issues — great and small — that interest them. For free. They don’t understand the people who contribute to WikipediaWikipediaWikipedia for free, who maintain their own blogs for free, who Twitter for free, who constantly refresh and update their Facebook page for free, who want to help tell the stories of what is happening in their lives and in their communities… for free.”

Onward State’s motivational strategy seems to be representative of this view. “Money making is not something that we’ve really embraced yet,” said Shaver. The money from one fund raiser they did manage went to a staff party.


A Divergent Future

In reality, the “old vs. new media” split is not a cleanly sliced dichotomy. Media titans, such as CNN, now regularly respond on-air to Twitter chatter, especially during the 2009 Iran Election Crisis, for example. But, as Jon Stewart has joked, the adoption of social media has been a messy collision of disparate worlds.

Perhaps the future of how this will all unfold is again best foretold by the situation at Penn State. Onward State plans to dive into the dark waters of amateur content, developing a larger space for user-generated content on both FacebookFacebookFacebook and its website. The Collegian, in contrast, has just begun (as of January) to play with a more interactive Twitter feed, and is explicit about keeping user content at arm’s length.

However, it’s far too early to tell which strategy is, ultimately, more advantageous. The Chronicle of Higher Education reports that the flash-bang success of online college newspapers may be unsustainable, especially if a charismatic leader leaves the paper for, say, a semester abroad. Professional blogs as well, may find some undiscovered Kryptonite. If the pace of innovation is any indication, it may not be long before we know the answer.



For more social media coverage, follow Mashable Social Media on TwitterTwitterTwitter or become a fan on Facebook




More journalism resources from Mashable:


- The Future Journalist: Thoughts from Two Generations
- Can E-readers and Tablets Save the News?
- 5 Essential Tools for the Mobile Journalist
- 8 Things to Avoid When Building a Community
- 8 Must-Have Traits of Tomorrow’s Journalist

Image courtesy of iStockphotoiStockphotoiStockphoto, fotosipsak